嫁给有钱人的秘方

来源：人民网－《环球时报》
王 悦 编译

　　一个年轻漂亮的美国女孩在美国一家大型网上论坛金融版上发表了这样一个问题帖：我怎样才能嫁给有钱人？
　　
　　“我下面要说的都是心里话。本人25岁，非常漂亮，是那种让人惊艳的漂亮，谈吐文雅，有品位，想嫁给年薪 50万美元的人。你也许会说我贪心，但在纽约年薪100万才算是中产，本人的要求其实不高。
　　
　　这个版上有没有年薪超过 50万的人？你们都结婚了吗？我想请教各位一个问题——怎样才能嫁给你们这样的有钱人？我约会过的人中，最有钱的年薪 25万，这似乎是我的上限。要住进纽约中心公园以西的高尚住宅区，年薪25万远远不够。我是来诚心诚意请教的。有几个具体的问题：一、有钱的单身汉一般都在哪里消磨时光？　(请列出酒吧、饭店、健身房的名字和详细地址。)二、我应该把目标定在哪个年龄段？三、为什么有些富豪的妻子看起来相貌平平？我见过有些女孩，长相如同白开水，毫无吸引人的地方，但她们却能嫁入豪门。而单身酒吧里那些迷死人的美女却运气不佳。四、你们怎么决定谁能做妻子，谁只能做女朋友？　(我现在的目标是结婚。)”——波尔斯女士
　　
　　下面是一个华尔街金融家的回帖：
　　
　　“亲爱的波尔斯：我怀着极大的兴趣看完了贵帖，相信不少女士也有跟你类似的疑问。让我以一个投资专家的身份，对你的处境做一分析。我年薪超过50万，符合你的择偶标准，所以请相信我并不是在浪费大家的时间。
　　
　　从生意人的角度来看，跟你结婚是个糟糕的经营决策，道理再明白不过，请听我解释。抛开细枝末节，你所说的其实是一笔简单的“财”“貌”交易：甲方提供述人的外表，乙万出钱，公平交易，童叟无欺。但是，这里有个致命的问题，你的美貌会消逝，但我的钱却不会无缘无故减少。事实上，我的收入很可能会逐年涕增．而你不可能一年比一年漂亮。
　　
　　因此，从经济学的角度讲，我是增值资产，你是贬值资产，不但贬值，而且是加速贬值!你现在25，在未来的五年里，你仍可以保持窈窕的身段，俏丽的容貌，虽然每年略有退步。但美貌消逝的速度会越来越快，如果它是你仅有的资产，十年以后你的价值甚忧。
　　
　　用华尔街术语说，每笔交易都有一个仓位，跟你交往属于“交易仓位”(tradingl position)，一旦价值下跌就要立即抛售，而不宜长期持有——也就是你想要的婚姻。听起来很残忍，但对一件会加速贬值的物资，明智的选择是租赁，而不是购入。年薪能超过50万的人，当然都不是傻瓜，因此我们只会跟你交往，但不会跟你结婚。所以我劝你不要苦苦寻找嫁给有钱人的秘方。顺便说一句，你倒可以想办法把自己变成年薪50万的人，这比碰到一个有钱的傻瓜的胜算要大。
　　
　　希望我的回帖能对你有帮助。如果你对“租赁”感兴趣，请跟我联系。”——罗波．坎贝尔（J·P·摩根银行多种产业投资顾问）

太通透了 罗波．坎贝尔  这样的男人有钱袋也有脑袋  绝对是精英  呵呵！
“想办法把自己变成年薪50万的人，这比碰到一个有钱的傻瓜的胜算要大”
把贬值资产变成增值资产  赞叹啊！ 这观点！  经典  真是经典！

呵呵，如果是那么美貌的女人，想要有钱的话，那么就去做“租赁”没什么不好了

反正也没有爱情可谈

faint，几天前在 office 和同组的英国 DD　兴致勃勃地讨论这个帖子（英文版）来着～～～　

这个精英绝对一辈子打光棍，因为只要是女人都是贬值资产。

给他生几个儿子培养出来，这女人不就增值了吗。

这好像是笑口常开的内容 因为租赁和情感无关哦～，或者投资？

英文原版的读着更有意思， 已经在各个投行之间转传得不亦乐乎。

哪儿有英文版的？谢叻

引用

引用第1楼Ling1984于10-13-2007 18:26发表的  :
太通透了 罗波．坎贝尔   这样的男人有钱袋也有脑袋  绝对是精英  呵呵！
！

关键问题是 有钱又有头脑的， 呵呵。。。 不多。。 呵呵。。。

What a classic answer…..

THIS APPEARED ON CRAIG’S LIST

What am I doing wrong?

Okay, I’m tired of beating around the bush. I’m a beautiful (spectacularly beautiful) 25 year old girl. I’m articulate and classy.
I’m not from New York . I’m looking to get married to a guy who makes at least half a million a year. I know how that sounds, but keep in mind that a million a year is middle class in New York City, so I don’t think I’m overreaching at all.

Are there any guys who make 500K or more on this board? Any wives? Could you send me some tips? I dated a business man who makes average around 200 - 250. But that’s where I seem to hit a roadblock. 250,000 won’t get me to central park west. I know a woman in my yoga class who was married to an investment banker and lives in Tribeca, and she’s not as pretty as I am, nor is she a great genius. So what is she doing right? How do I get to her level?

Here are my questions specifically:

- Where do you single rich men hang out? Give me specifics- bars, restaurants, gyms

-What are you looking for in a mate? Be honest guys, you won’t hurt my feelings

-Is there an age range I should be targeting (I’m 25)?

- Why are some of the women living lavish lifestyles on the upper east side so plain? I’ve seen really ‘plain jane’ boring types who have nothing to offer married to incredibly wealthy guys. I’ve seen drop dead gorgeous girls in singles bars in the east village. What’s the story there?

- Jobs I should look out for? Everyone knows - lawyer, investment banker, doctor. How much do those guys really make? And where do they hang out? Where do the hedge fund guys hang out?

- How you decide marriage vs. just a girlfriend? I am looking for MARRIAGE ONLY

Please hold your insults - I’m putting myself out there in an honest way. Most beautiful women are superficial; at least I’m being up front about it. I wouldn’t be searching for these kind of guys if I wasn’t able to match them - in looks, culture, sophistication, and keeping a nice home and hearth.

it’s NOT ok to contact this poster with services or other commercial interests
PostingID: 432279810

THE ANSWER

Dear Pers-431649184:

I read your posting with great interest and have thought meaningfully about your dilemma. I offer the following analysis of your predicament.
Firstly, I’m not wasting your time, I qualify as a guy who fits your bill; that is I make more than $500K per year. That said here’s how I see it.

Your offer, from the prospective of a guy like me, is plain and simple a crappy business deal. Here’s why. Cutting through all the B.S., what you suggest is a simple trade: you bring your looks to the party and I bring my money. Fine, simple. But here’s the rub, your looks will fade and my money will likely continue into perpetuity…in fact, it is very likely that my income increases but it is an absolute certainty that you won’t be getting any more beautiful!

So, in economic terms you are a depreciating asset and I am an earning asset. Not only are you a depreciating asset, your depreciation accelerates! Let me explain, you’re 25 now and will likely stay pretty hot for the next 5 years, but less so each year. Then the fade begins in earnest. By 35 stick a fork in you!

So in Wall Street terms, we would call you a trading position, not a buy and hold…hence the rub…marriage. It doesn’t make good business sense to “buy you” (which is what you’re asking) so I’d rather lease. In case you think I’m being cruel, I would say the following. If my money were to go away, so would you, so when your beauty fades I need an out. It’s as simple as that. So a deal that makes sense is dating, not marriage.

Separately, I was taught early in my career about efficient markets. So, I wonder why a girl as “articulate, classy and spectacularly beautiful”
as you has been unable to find your sugar daddy. I find it hard to believe that if you are as gorgeous as you say you are that the $500K hasn’t found you, if not only for a tryout.

By the way, you could always find a way to make your own money and then we wouldn’t need to have this difficult conversation.

With all that said, I must say you’re going about it the right way.

Classic “pump and dump.”

I hope this is helpful, and if you want to enter into some sort of lease, let me know.


This entry was posted on Thursday, October 4th, 2007 at 9:32 AM and filed under Wallstripped, Wallstrip, WallStrip.com.
Follow comments here with the RSS 2.0 (XML) feed. Post a comment or leave a trackback.

引用

引用第4楼一手臭牌于10-14-2007 04:00发表的  :
这个精英绝对一辈子打光棍，因为只要是女人都是贬值资产。

给他生几个儿子培养出来，这女人不就增值了吗。

是啊，是啊，照他那么说所有女人都会贬值的

我觉得，这男人说的纯是资产角度。

换个角度说：是男人，总要结婚的吧？除非你不想被社会承认。另外，你总想要孩子吧！一个人又完成不了这个工作。迈克尔杰克逊这样的怪物还是不被大众认可的。在这种情况下，无论资产是否贬值，你总要挑一个回去。也就是说，这叫消费剩余为负。明知道买回家的产品是负值，也非得买。同样的产品还有，电脑，汽车。你会因为汽车每开一天就贬值一天而不买吗？你会因为电脑每天贬值就不用吗？其实，大多数产品，除了投资产品，买回家就是等贬值，等扔的。跟这些产品比，女人要保值的多。

如果生俩孩子，你就赚了。生三五个，你就赚大发了。

对女人而言，明知道百万富翁危险，可如果钓上了，后半生就有保障了。若多生几个，基本就把他资产搞穷了。这种投资，对不断贬值的女人来说，显然是划算的。大不了你富翁离婚了，她还能分不少财产呢！再加上孩子的抚养费等等等等，这一辈子就跟银行一样，找到打工的了。

其实，这女的的思想，我很鄙视的。原因是，女人的主体，是人。人不是商品，或者说应该是超越价值规律之外的商品。如果把自己等同于一件衣服，一双袜子，那么就把自己个物化了。你要嫁的，是你爱的人，喜欢他的性格思想，而不是喜欢他的钞票。不然一生太亏了。

若只剩下一张脸的女人，没大脑，没个性，没内涵，显然买主不会档次太高。

Excellent!

照那个金融家的话说，有钱人找老婆做的不都是赔本生意？哪有女人不老的？看起来很经典的回答，其实存在很大的问题。也就是图一时口舌之快罢了，毕竟男人都很讨厌拜金女。

引用

引用第13楼宝贝贤婧于10-15-2007 14:00发表的  :
照那个金融家的话说，有钱人找老婆做的不都是赔本生意？哪有女人不老的？看起来很经典的回答，其实存在很大的问题。也就是图一时口舌之快罢了，毕竟男人都很讨厌拜金女。

其实， 我觉的女人比男人讨厌拜金女更讨厌拜金男。    打个比方，如果我老公是为了我家的钱跟我在一起，我是连死的心都有。  如果我是为了我老公的钱跟他在一起， 他大概就没我那么痛苦。