登录注册
社区应用 最新帖子 精华区 社区服务 会员列表 统计排行
主题 : 北美教育界惊天大丑闻:二十二个中国学生被调查
lili 离线
级别: 论坛版主

显示用户信息 
楼主  发表于: 2007-05-05   

北美教育界惊天大丑闻:二十二个中国学生被调查

管理提醒: 本帖被 卡拉 从 [ 乱讲 ] 移动到本区(2007-05-06)

http://www.popyard.com/cgi-mod/newspage.cgi?num=102360&r=0&v=0
信源:zhangjy1博客|编辑:2007-05-04| 网址:http://www.popyard.org        抄送朋友|打印保留


八阕 http://www.popyard.org 【八阕】原题:DUKE中国学生丢脸丢到国外 北美教育界惊天大丑闻

请问有谁能证实这篇报道。如果属实国人的诚信将受到冲击。

来源: zhangjy1 于 07-05-04 07:02:48

不敢相信是真的。转载文章指出华裔学生是这件丑闻的主谋。看了非常令人不安。

(转载)中国学生丢脸丢到国外 北美教育界惊天大丑闻

杜克富科(FUQUA)商学院四月底宣布结束长达两个月的对三十八个一年级MBA学生舞弊行为的调查。调查结果:九名学生将面临被开除的厄运,十五名学生被停学一年,十名学生这门课必修课记为零分,四名无罪。这是杜克富科商学院建校三十余年以来最大的丑闻,也是北美商学院十年来绝无仅有的重大学生舞弊案件。

鉴于美国联邦隐私权保护条例,学校不会公布学生的种族和名单。但据知情人士透露,有十三名中国学生将受到严厉处分:八名开除,五名停学。另外还有将近十名被警告加重修这门功课。事件起源于三月初的一门决策模型必修课程。学生可以把考试带回家去做,但整个案例必须独自完成。学生最后还得把他们的 EXCEL模型通过网上提交。在评卷过程中老师发现不少答案有惊人的相似之处。初步调查没有结果:虽然证据明显,却没有人承认有任何的抄袭行为。中国学生的抵赖行为迫使教授把平时的作业也调出来,发现了更多的作弊证据。

在确凿的证据和教授的严厉讯问下,学生们终于被迫承认是聚集在一起互相抄袭或合作。调查委员会对学生进行了为期将近一个月的质询,最终于四月中旬决定对二十多名中国学生提出正式起诉。四月二十八号上午十一点,学校官方通过电子邮件向所有商学院学生宣布了庭审结果。富科商学院正副院长在宣布当天下午就此事举行内部新闻发布会回答学生问题。一时间,愤怒,失望,和谩骂充斥了整个校园。

大多数美国和国际都学生觉得学校给予的处分太轻。事值 2007届学生即将毕业之际,喜庆的校园登时蒙上了一层浓厚的阴霭。有的学生要求公布案情细节,希望明白为什么有人的处分仅仅是把功课级为零分而已。为了显示学校对学术道德的重视,校方主动新闻媒体发布此事。CNN教育版,华尔街日报,和商务周刊在近几天都对这次丑闻有所报导。对于所有的中国学生来说,这样的结果却是大大的出乎意料。毕竟,大多数富科的中国学生没有过任何的在美国学习和工作过的经验,以为这件事情学校会轻描淡写地掩盖过去。处分结果下来后,十几个受处分的学生跑到院长办公厅门口去静坐示威。有一位受处分的中国学生在宣布会还散发了这样的传单:停学?开除?我们花钱要的是教育,而不是惩罚!学生们还积极寻找校友,舆论和律师来给学校施加压力,以期能得到轻点的处罚。中国学生诸如此类的不理智行为引起了校园社区的巨大反感。除了律师为赚取佣金答应帮忙以外,舆论导向对中国颇为不利。学校数年来第一次调用了数名警察在学生活动中心进行巡逻以防不测。

富科商学院自从在 2001年以最年轻的知名商学院身份晋身商务周刊全美排名第五,创造了北美商学教育的一大奇迹以后,最近几年排名低迷不振,在最近的一次US NEWS 排名中,仅被排为第十二名。这次事件对于这年轻的学院来说或是一起重大的打击,或是重塑形象的一个契机。

 

富科商学院集体舞弊事件受处分的中国学生列表

二十二个中国学生被调查,八个开除,五个停学,六个被罚重修,一个无罪,两个未详。

Yu Cheng 开除

Yu (Harry) Huang 开除

Hua (Dianthe) Jin 开除

Shen Lu 开除

Jun (Kevin) Qin 开除

Degang (Kendall) Shen 开除

Dan (Chelsea) Wei 开除

Hua (Stella) Zhang 开除

Hanlan (Angela) Fu 停学一年

Wei (Vealla) Sun 停学一年

Jingxiu (Kane) Zhang 停学一年

Lin Zheng 停学一年

Pingfan (Elle) Zhou 停学一年

Di Wu 重修课程

Qian (Harry) Wang 重修课程

Chunning (Christine) Yang 重修课程

Yong Yang 重修课程

Jizhi (Justin) Yao 重修课程

Hongmiao (Hugo) Zhao 重修课程

按:富科商学院2008届总共有二十八名中国学生,占所有一年级学生人数的百分之七。
评价一下你浏览此帖子的感受

精彩

感动

搞笑

开心

愤怒

无聊

灌水
lili 离线
级别: 论坛版主

显示用户信息 
沙发  发表于: 2007-05-05   
八阕 http://www.popyard.org 【八阕】

http://www.fuqua.duke.edu/news/honorcode-0407.html

Statement of Douglas T. Breeden

Dean, The Fuqua School of Business

April 27, 2007

April 27 , 2007 | If you walk into any classroom at Fuqua, you will see posted the preamble to the school’s Honor Code, which states the following:

“Duke University’s Fuqua School of Business is a community of scholars and learners, committed to the principles of honesty, trustworthiness, fairness, and respect for others.”

We place these words prominently in our classrooms because they represent our core values as an institution. They serve as a daily reminder to students that they share with faculty and staff a personal responsibility to promote integrity in both their academic and non-academic endeavors. One of the exceptional things about Fuqua is how its students come from so many countries and cultures, uniting as a community around a set of common principles that the Honor Code expresses clearly and eloquently.

A copy of the code and its procedures can be found at: http://www.fuqua.duke.edu/admin/stuserv/student_affairs/hnrcode.html.

Fuqua depends on every member of its community to uphold the code in both spirit and action. This is why we require, as a condition for enrollment, that all students acknowledge their personal acceptance of the code.

Accordingly, we treat allegations of Honor Code violations very seriously and have established procedures in place to consider such allegations. On April 26th, Fuqua’s Judicial Board, following the procedures set forth in the Honor Code, found 34 members of our first-year class guilty of cheating in a required first-year course. Nine of the students received a penalty of expulsion, 15 received a one-year suspension and a failing mark in the class involved, nine received a failing mark in the class and one received a failing mark on an assignment.

It is important to emphasize that the students have a right to appeal their convictions and penalties, and no final determination about guilt or innocence can be made until the appeal process is concluded. Consistent with Duke University’s policy, the students are allowed to continue in classes and take exams throughout the appeals process.

We expect this process to take approximately one month.

To Duke’s Fuqua Community:

As we move into the appeals stage following the Judicial Board’s action last week, I thought it would be good to update the members of Duke’s Fuqua community on a few matters. As I mentioned at the forum for our Daytime MBA students on Friday, I am a participant in the appeals process and thus am constrained from remarking on all but the most basic facts.

The Appeals Committee is comprised of the Dean (me) or his designate, a tenured faculty member appointed by the Dean, and a student appointed by the Dean. Appeals must be made in writing within fifteen days of a conviction (which occurred on Thursday, April 26). Following that, the Appeals Committee has ten business days in which to respond. The Appeals Committee will then publish a summary of its conclusions for the benefit of our students and faculty.

In response to some inquiries arising from the recent Judicial Board action, I feel it is important to emphasize to our community that those students involved represent both domestic and international students. Reflecting the global diversity of Duke’s Fuqua School of Business, the students involved come from multiple countries on four different continents. Also, students' conduct on both the final exam and other assignments in the course were investigated. Each case is unique and complex, and the charge to the Judicial Board is to take great care in considering the individual circumstances surrounding each. I am confident the appeals process will show the same meticulous consideration for each and every appeal.

For More Information Contact:

Chris Privett

Duke University

The Fuqua School of Business

[email protected]

(919) 660-8090
lili 离线
级别: 论坛版主

显示用户信息 
板凳  发表于: 2007-05-05   
错了, 又错了。。。 麻烦移到热点。。。。
arthur 离线
级别: 军区司令员

显示用户信息 
地板  发表于: 2007-05-06   
大陆来的中国学生大概不懂什么是code of hornor,看来学校对他们还是挺客气的,正常情况应该全部开除。我读研究生的时候也有两个大陆来的学弟考试作弊,结果系里看在他们是中国学生没开除他们。要是真的开除了就得回国了。但是处罚轻了对别的学生也不公平。
垂涎三尺,非一日之馋。
valley_hu 离线
级别: 连长
显示用户信息 
地下室  发表于: 2007-05-07   
也许是从国内带过去的陋习.
描述
快速回复

验证问题:
3 * 6 = ? 正确答案:18
按"Ctrl+Enter"直接提交